The senior most judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Qazi Faizisa raised objection to the proceedings of the larger bench against his decision. The word Master of Rosters is nowhere found in the Constitution.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa issued a detailed note in the case of Hafiz Quran additional number. In which it is written that the federal government has removed the registrar Ishrat Ali from the post on April 3, the registrar disobeyed the order of the government and issued the roster of the 6-member bench on April 4, the registrar issued an illegal circular on the decision of March 29. . The decision of the three-judge bench by the six-judge bench was wrong, the larger bench had no authority to issue the April 4 order.
In the detailed note, it was further written that a letter was also written to the Chief Justice about the illegal circular, but no response was received. A 6-member larger bench was formed only after realizing that the circular was unconstitutional. No other bench can hear an appeal against the order of the Supreme Court. .
Justice Faiz Isa further wrote in a detailed note that the formation of the so-called larger bench was legal and it was not a constitutional court, the decision of the 6-member larger bench has no constitutional status, the larger bench hastily conducted the hearing and also the 8-page decision. Issued, if the hearing had been conducted normally, the 4 judges would have wondered what their seniors were doing. In the note, it was also written that the notice has not been issued to the Attorney General till date while the PMDC’s lawyer has also not been given a notice.
In the detailed note, it was further said that the work of the judiciary is to make decisions according to the constitution and law, if the powers are exceeded, the oath of the judges will be violated. , the order of the Larger Bench gives an authoritarian look which cannot be a substitute for the Constitution, the word Master of Rosters used for the Chief Justice is nowhere found in the Constitution.